Blog

“It is a competition, we need to start thinking of ourselves.”

There is always a fair share of drama on The Block, and a fiery new feud has now torn four friends apart.

Log-gate has caused a huge rift between houses three and four as tensions have escalated to near-breaking point.

With lots of drama already happening on the show, here’s a refresher.

While the contestants worked on their kitchens, they had the opportunity to claim some timber and logs for their landscaping.

The contestants were told it was first in best dressed, so Taz tried to claim all of the logs by tagging them, which left a bitter taste in Sonny’s mouth.
Sonny was less than impressed with Taz’s tactic to claim all of the logs. (Credit: The Block)
In retaliation, Sonny also tagged some himself and said he did not care if Taz was unimpressed.

Determined to get back on track after they copped harsh feedback from the judges, Sonny said that they re-submitted their landscaping plans to include arbours.

Things all came to a head during this week’s body corp meeting, when the plumber put the police officer on blast, and said the couple was “greedy”.

“Are you calling us greedy?” Britt asked.

“In a sense, yes,” her best friend Alicia clipped in return, still annoyed at being neglected by her.

Irritated, Britt then said she thought the Gold Coast couple was purposefully winning the $10,000 budgeting prize. So far, Sonny and Alicia have won it five weeks out of the seven.

“It’s a bit of a grey area,” she said, which sent Alicia into a spiral.

Before she walked away, Alicia tearfully said she already felt upset, because she was left out when 2023 winner, Steph, came with her husband, Gian.
Alicia is not happy with her “bestie” Britt. (Credit: Channel Nine)

Is Britt and Alicia’s friendship over on The Block?

The body corp meeting came to a bitter end when Alicia said her friends in the real world would not do that.

“Your friends aren’t on The Block,” Taz said flatly.

After this exchange, she said she felt “mortified” and that his comments were “nasty”.

“It showed me that they didn’t care, so that was really hurtful,” Alicia lamented in a piece-to-camera.

When Steph was in Daylesford, she spent a lot of time with Britt.

To Alicia, she said it was an unfair advantage.

“I’ve lost my BFF Britt to Steph, while they’re here on The Block, I’ve noticed they’re becoming quite friendly,” she said during kitchen week.

Not only that, Britt also went shopping solo after promising they’d go together.

The NHL offseason is always full of surprises, but few moves have generated as much buzz as the recent trade involving Noah Dobson and the Montreal Canadiens.

In a league where salary cap pressures and roster decisions often go hand in hand, the New York Islanders’ decision to part ways with one of their top defensemen has sent shockwaves through the hockey world.

With the Canadiens landing a coveted right-shot blueliner and the Islanders making a bold commitment to youth and financial flexibility, questions abound about the true motivations behind the deal.

As insiders and fans alike try to make sense of the move, even star goaltender Ilya Sorokin has weighed in, offering a rare glimpse into the tough choices teams face behind closed doors.

With the new season fast approaching and the Islanders navigating a shifting roster landscape, all eyes are on how these changes will shape the team’s future.

Photo credit: Dennis Schneidler-Imagn Images

As usual, Kent Hughes made a big splash at the NHL Draft by acquiring right-shot defenseman Noah Dobson.

While the Montreal Canadiens landed a top-pairing blueliner, the Islanders lost a player in his prime.

Mathieu Darche only received Emil Heineman as an active player in return, while the other two pieces in the deal-Victor Eklund and Kashawn Aitcheson-are draft picks who have yet to prove anything.

The trade surprised many, including the Islanders’ current star goaltender, Ilya Sorokin.

He revealed in an interview with RG Media that Darche chose to sacrifice Dobson in favor of Alexander Romanov.

The real reason behind Noah Dobson’s trade to the Montreal Canadiens is linked to the rise of young Alexander Romanov

That’s what Sorokin disclosed.

“That one surprised me!

But honestly, the team couldn’t keep both [Alexander] Romanov and Dobson.

The salary cap forces tough decisions-it’s the reality.

Dobson got a good contract in Montreal, and I wish him nothing but success.”

– Ilya Sorokin

As the goalie pointed out, Romanov was given an 8-year contract worth $50M, or $6.25M per year.

That’s a savings of $3.25M for the Islanders compared to Dobson’s new deal with the Canadiens.

Ilya Sorokin at the center of trade rumors!

The netminder was also asked about the trade rumors that had been swirling around him behind the scenes.

“I wasn’t surprised by the rumors-it’s part of the business.

What did surprise me, though, was how seriously people took them, even though everyone knows I have a no-trade clause.

But in the end, let them talk.”

– Ilya Sorokin

Sorokin will begin the second season of his eight-year deal this fall, which pays him $8.25M per year.

The contract includes a full no-movement clause valid through July 1, 2028, making him very difficult to trade.

After that date, he will have to submit a list of 16 teams to which he does not wish to be traded.

With Dobson gone, the goalie will need to be at his best next season to help keep the team competitive.

It won’t be easy for him, coming off a year where he posted a 2.69 goals-against average and a .907 save percentage.

It will be interesting to see how the Islanders manage next season, especially with Mathieu Darche seemingly uninterested in a full rebuild.

“SIT DOWN, KAROLINE — YOU ARE NOT QUALIFICABLE!” — Patti Scialfa’s Live Bombshell Shocks Audiences

In a stunning moment that has reverberated across social media and news outlets, Patti Scialfa, the wife of legendary musician Bruce Springsteen, made headlines during a live broadcast when she directed a fiery remark at political commentator Karoline Leavitt.

The unexpected exchange has sparked widespread discussion, raising questions about the intersection of celebrity culture and political discourse.

As viewers tuned in, they were left wondering: what led to this explosive confrontation, and what does it reveal about the current state of public dialogue?

The Context of the Confrontation

The incident occurred during a live segment on a well-known talk show, where Scialfa was invited as a guest to discuss her latest projects and her life with Springsteen.

Leavitt, known for her outspoken views and political commentary, was also part of the panel. As the conversation shifted towards political qualifications and the role of celebrities in politics, tensions began to rise.

Scialfa’s remark, “SIT DOWN, KAROLINE — YOU ARE NOT QUALIFICABLE!” caught everyone off guard, leaving both the audience and Leavitt visibly stunned.

The comment was not only a personal jibe but also a broader critique of the increasing tendency for public figures to engage in political discussions without the necessary qualifications or expertise.

Audience Reactions and Social Media Buzz

Immediately following the exchange, social media erupted with reactions from fans, commentators, and political analysts. Many applauded Scialfa for her boldness, viewing her statement as a much-needed reminder that celebrity does not equate to political acumen.

One Twitter user wrote, “Finally, someone said it! Just because you have a platform doesn’t mean you should use it for politics.”

Conversely, others criticized Scialfa for her outburst, arguing that it was dismissive and undermined the importance of diverse voices in political discourse.

“Everyone has the right to share their opinion, even if it’s not backed by qualifications,” another user stated. This divide in public opinion highlights the ongoing debate about who gets to participate in political discussions and the criteria they should meet.

The Broader Implications of Celebrity Involvement in Politics

Scialfa’s comments bring to light a crucial issue in contemporary society: the role of celebrities in political conversations. In recent years, many entertainers have become increasingly vocal about their political beliefs, often using their platforms to advocate for various causes.

While some argue that this can help raise awareness about important issues, others contend that it can lead to misinformation and a lack of accountability.

Leavitt, who has built a career as a political commentator, represents a new wave of individuals blending entertainment with political commentary.

However, Scialfa’s pointed remark raises questions about the qualifications necessary to engage in such discussions. Are celebrity endorsements and opinions valuable, or do they risk oversimplifying complex political issues?

Patti Scialfa: A Voice of Reason?

As a musician and artist, Patti Scialfa has long been associated with the cultural landscape of America. Her marriage to Bruce Springsteen, a figure synonymous with social and political activism through music, adds weight to her words.

Scialfa’s unexpected outburst may be seen as a call for more thoughtful discourse in an age where soundbites often overshadow substantive discussion.

In her career, Scialfa has focused on themes of love, resilience, and social justice in her music. Her comment to Leavitt could be interpreted as a reflection of her desire for a more informed and respectful dialogue in the public sphere.

As she navigates her role as both an artist and a public figure, her stance may resonate with those who feel similarly frustrated by the current political climate.

The Aftermath: What’s Next for Karoline Leavitt?

In the wake of Scialfa’s explosive statement, all eyes are on Karoline Leavitt. Known for her strong opinions and unapologetic approach, Leavitt has not shied away from controversy in the past. How she responds to this public confrontation could shape her future in the political commentary landscape.

Leavitt may choose to address Scialfa’s remark directly, potentially turning the incident into an opportunity to further her platform. Alternatively, she might opt to downplay the exchange, focusing instead on her political agenda.

Regardless of her approach, the incident has undoubtedly placed her in the spotlight, prompting discussions about the legitimacy of her voice in political discourse.

Conclusion: A Moment of Reflection

Patti Scialfa’s live-on-air bombshell has ignited a conversation that extends beyond a single remark. It challenges us to reflect on the qualifications we expect from those who engage in political dialogue and the impact of celebrity culture on public discourse.

As audiences grapple with the implications of this exchange, it serves as a reminder that the intersection of entertainment and politics is fraught with complexity.

In an era where opinions are shared at lightning speed, the call for thoughtful engagement and informed discussion has never been more critical.

Whether one agrees with Scialfa’s sentiment or not, her words have sparked a necessary dialogue about the roles we all play in shaping the political landscape. As the fallout continues, it remains to be seen how this moment will influence both Scialfa and Leavitt’s futures in their respective arenas.

“Why Did You Take My Son?”: Heartbroken Parents of Charlie Kirk Break Their Silence as His Body Arrives in Phoenix – Wife Collapses in Tears Watching Her Husband’s Casket Lifted Onto the Plane in Front of Supporters

Charlie Kirk came home to Phoenix for the last time on September 11, his flag-draped casket carried off Air Force Two under the watch of grieving family, devastated friends, and a stunned nation.

The conservative firebrand and Turning Point USA founder, assassinated in Utah just days earlier, was met with silence and tears as a motorcade of black vehicles and flashing lights carried him through the city streets to Hansen Mortuary Chapel.

But behind the public display of mourning, a private heartbreak unfolded. For the very first time, Charlie’s parents – who had lived their entire lives in the shadows, fiercely private and never once appearing with their son in public – stepped forward. They flew in immediately, shattered, to stand by his side and bring him home to Arizona.

Witnesses said his mother sobbed uncontrollably the moment she saw the casket being lifted. Clutching her chest, she cried out: “Why did You do this to my son? Please, give me my boy back.” His father, usually silent and composed, was described as pale and broken, barely able to walk as he leaned on relatives for support.

Erika Kirk, Charlie’s wife, stood beside her mother-in-law, trying to stay strong for their two children – but the moment the casket of her husband, her partner, the father of their kids, was raised onto the plane, she broke down. Friends said she wept quietly at first, then completely lost control, her cries echoing across the tarmac as supporters holding American flags bowed their heads in grief.

The heartbreaking scene came only hours after an air traffic controller, his voice cracking over the radio, welcomed Kirk’s remains to Phoenix with the haunting words: “Welcome home, Charlie. You didn’t deserve this. May God bless your family.”

Dozens of mourners lined the roads near the airport, waving flags and holding candles as the motorcade passed. Some wore bright red MAGA hats, others carried handmade signs calling Kirk “a hero” and “a patriot silenced.”

No details about the funeral have yet been announced, but former President Donald Trump has already vowed to attend. “They’ve asked me to go, and I think I have an obligation to be there,” Trump said earlier in the day.

For now, what remains is raw grief: a wife suddenly widowed, children without their father, and parents who, after decades of protecting their private lives, are now forced into the public eye in the most devastating way imaginable – weeping over the son they can never bring back.

“There’s been a lot of highs this year but it’s also been a year where I’ve had to manage a lot of physical pain,” says Guy Sebastian.

Former Voice coach Guy Sebastian is recovering in hospital following spinal surgery.

On Instagram he told his followers, “They say it comes in threes. There’s been a lot of highs this year but it’s also been a year where I’ve had to manage a lot of physical pain. The worst of it has been this nerve pain in my spine shooting down my right side. I wouldn’t wish this pain on anyone. It just never stops and it’s all consuming, while trying to work, travel, do gigs etc.

“I am however so grateful for the fact that I have been able to have spinal surgery yesterday. I hope it gives me relief and the strength comes back in my arm.

“My goal is to get all of this sorted and bounce back hard for tour early next year. I’ll get there and I will get it done but wow, in a fair bit of pain right now.”

Get well soon!

LAS VEGAS — After losing by 16 in Game 1 and giving away homecourt advantage of the WNBA semifinals to the Indiana Fever, A’ja Wilson was as upset as she has been all season.

“I told my team yesterday that the loss yesterday was more embarrassing to me than the 53-point loss (to Minnesota) because we really didn’t do anything,” Wilson said Monday. “We didn’t do our job, so if we come to  work and do our job, it’s a different story.”

In order for the Aces to get back to their winning ways, setting the tone started with Wilson. Las Vegas’ roster has turned over in recent years, and the departures of Candace Parker, Alysha Clark and Sydney Colson, among others, have left Wilson not only as the Aces’ best player, but also as their leader.

Las Vegas needed a bounce-back game Tuesday from its star, and she has grown accustomed to shaking off individual bad performances. The last five times Wilson had made fewer than 30 percent of her field goals prior to Game 1, she responded with an average of 30.8 points and 12.2 rebounds.

She posted 25 points and nine rebounds in the Game 2 90-68 win, shooting 10 of 18 from the field after making 6 of 22 Sunday. Leading by example on the court comes easily to Wilson.

Keeping the locker room together has been a new challenge, but is also the natural evolution of a veteran in her eighth season trying to take on a bigger role for her team.

“My leadership skills looked different this year, it wasn’t something that I was used to,” Wilson said. “I had to put us all together as a team and figure out what makes people go.”

D’POY steal M’VP lay @_ajawilson22 // #RaiseTheStakes pic.twitter.com/1XYsjLaCkx

— Las Vegas Aces (@LVAces) September 24, 2025

That process kicked into high gear after the loss to the Lynx on Aug. 2. Coach Becky Hammon tasked individual Aces with designing their own scouting reports for every game going forward, and Wilson took the lead on that assignment. She was in charge of players-only meetings before the coaches got a look at the scouts.

Wilson noticed that some of her teammates were more willing to speak up in those meetings with her at the helm than when the entire coaching staff was involved. She met them at their level and then relayed that information to Hammon and her assistants.

“She’s communicating and talking a lot more in huddles and meetings and organizing us, little things on scouting reports during practice,” Aces guard Chelsea Gray said. “She’s just a lot more vocal, which is a step that she wanted and needed to take. … Her ability to relate and talk to everybody on different levels all the time has been great this year, and everyone has needed that.”

Hammon has said that this Aces roster more than others she’s coached required positive encouragement. She created highlight reels to remind players of their strengths and constantly reinforced how close she felt they were to turning the corner, even when they passed the midway point of the season with a .500 record.

Wilson latched onto that and figured out how to uplift her teammates and instill confidence in them. New Aces’ additions, like Dana Evans from Chicago, NaLyssa Smith from Dallas and Indiana, and even Jewell Loyd from Seattle, came from teams on which they no longer felt valued.

Earning validation from the best player in the world changed their trajectories.

“I want people to feel great in their own way, because that’s how we continue to push forward in life,” Wilson said. “This basketball’s going to stop dancing, but I need my teammates to know that I believe in them, we believe in them.”

“How she pours into each person on the team, that’s not really talked about a lot,” Loyd said. “The confidence she gives all the players and all the coaches, it’s remarkable.”

The Aces want to follow Wilson’s lead on the court, but seeing her vulnerability off of it has brought them closer. They’re watching her grow, navigating a new role and learning how to be better for her teammates; it makes their superstar more relatable. It has created a culture where they are able to hold each other accountable and confidently respond to a blowout loss. They know what Wilson will produce, but they can also rely on her to coax the best out of the rest of them.

Smith struggled in the series opener, making a string of defensive miscues that allowed the Fever to get in a first-half rhythm. Las Vegas doesn’t have frontcourt options beyond her, so Hammon was forced to ride with her and hope that Smith improved upon her earlier performance.

The four-year forward responded with her best playoff performance yet, scoring 18 points and adding seven rebounds while keeping the Aces’ defensive shell intact. As has been the case since Smith was traded from the Wings, she relied on Wilson’s communication to help her in tough spots.

“Having somebody alongside of me like A’ja, where she’s talking to me on the back side and telling me where things are at that helps a lot,” Smith said.

The Aces go as Wilson does. She had to take more ownership of the team to get Las Vegas where it wanted to be — as if the league’s only four-time MVP needed more on her plate. That is the price of greatness. Sometimes she falls short, but 19 wins in the last 21 games is a solid report card for Wilson’s new role.